48 Plasma Cell Disorders
- MGUS: M-protein <3 g/dL, PC <10%, no CRAB/SLiM; ~1%/yr progression
- SMM: M-protein ≥3 or PC 10-59%, no CRAB/SLiM; ~10%/yr progression
- MM dx: PC ≥10% + ≥1 CRAB or SLiM
- CRAB: ↑Ca, renal, anemia, bone
- SLiM: PC ≥60%, FLC ratio ≥100, MRI ≥1 focal lesion
- Staging: ISS (biochemistry) & FISH (cytogenetics) guide intensity
- High-risk: t(4;14), del(17p), TP53 mutations, high LDH
- Induction: Triplet (VRd, VTD) × 4-6 cycles
- Consolidation: ASCT for eligible (age <65-70, good PS)
- Maintenance: Lenalidomide 10-15 mg indefinite
- MRD: Flow ≥10^-4 or NGS ≥10^-6; MRD-neg = better OS
- Relapse: CAR-T, BCMA×CD3 inhibitors, re-challenge w/ prior agents
48.1 Overview & Epidemiology
Spectrum: MGUS → SMM → MM w/ clonal evolution & progressive risk
- Incidence: ~6/100,000/yr; median age 71 yr
- African Americans: 2× ↑ incidence
- Common cause: hypercalcemia (hospitalized), anemia (elderly)
48.2 Pathogenesis & Genomic Abnormalities
Early drivers: 1q gains, chr 13 loss, IgH translocations (45% MM)
48.2.1 IgH Translocations (FISH-detected)
- Standard-risk: t(11;14) → CCND1; favorable
- High-risk:
- t(4;14) → MMSET/NSD2, FGFR3; 15% MM
- t(14;16) → MAF; very aggressive
- t(14;20) → MAFB; rare, aggressive
- t(6;14) → CYCLIN D3; intermediate
48.2.2 Chromosome Gains & Losses
Favorable: Hyperdiploidy (trisomy 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 19, 21)
Unfavorable: - del(13p) → CDKN2A; 50% MM, shorter OS - del(1p) → independent adverse factor - del(17p) → TP53; rarest (5-10%), OS <2 yr
48.2.3 Mutations (WGS)
- KRAS/NRAS: 40% MM; define outcomes
- TP53: 10-15%; ↑ w/ progression
- BRAF: rare; treatable w/ inhibitors
48.3 Clinical Presentation & Diagnosis
48.3.1 Presentation
CRAB (any 1 = symptomatic MM): - Ca >11 mg/dL - Renal: Cr >2 or eGFR <40 - Anemia: Hb <10 g/dL - Bone: Lytic lesions ± fractures
SLiM: - PC ≥60% - FLC ratio ≥100 - MRI ≥1 focal lesion
Common: Bone pain (70%), anemia (70%), renal dysfn (20-30%), infections (10-20%)
48.3.2 Diagnostic Workup
- SPEP w/ immunofixation → M-spike, light chain type
- 24-hr urine UPEP w/ immunofixation → Bence Jones
- Quantitative Ig → suppressed normal Ig
- Serum FLC → κ/λ ratio
- β2-M, LDH, Ca, Cr, albumin → staging
- CBC, chemistries, LFTs
- BM aspiration/biopsy:
- ≥10% clonal PC = diagnostic
- FISH: t(4;14), del(17p), del(1p)
- Imaging:
- CT → lytic lesions
- MRI → gold standard for BM, EMD
- PET-CT → optional prognostication
48.4 MGUS, SMM & MM
48.4.1 MGUS
- Def: M-protein <3 g/dL, PC <10%, no CRAB/SLiM
- Prev: ~3% age ≥50, ~5-10% age >70
- Progression: ~1%/yr (cumulative 30% @ 30 yr)
- Risk (Rajkumar):
- Low: M-protein <1.5, IgG, normal FLC → 0.5%/yr
- Int: M-protein 1.5-2.5 or abnormal FLC → 1%/yr
- High: M-protein ≥2.5 or IgM/IgA or abnormal FLC → 3%/yr
- Mgmt: Low-risk = observe; Int/high = f/u 6 mo then annually
48.4.2 SMM
- Def: M-protein ≥3 or PC 10-59% or FLC ratio ≥100, no CRAB/SLiM
- Progression: ~10%/yr to MM (first 5 yr)
- Risk:
- Low: PC <60%, slow M-protein rise → PFS >10 yr
- High: PC ≥60% or fast M-protein rise → PFS <2 yr
- Genomic high-risk: del(17p), t(4;14), >3 MRI lesions
- Mgmt: Low = observe (3-6 mo f/u); high = consider lenalidomide ± induction
48.4.3 MM (Symptomatic)
- Def: PC ≥10% + ≥1 CRAB or SLiM
48.5 Staging & Prognostic Factors
48.5.1 Revised ISS (RISS)
| Stage | Criteria | 5-yr PFS | 5-yr OS |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | β2-M <3.5, alb ≥3.5, standard-risk | 82% | 82% |
| II | Not I or III | 62% | 62% |
| III | β2-M ≥5.5, high-risk | 40% | 40% |
48.5.2 Cytogenetics (FISH)
Standard-risk: No del(17p), t(4;14), del(1p)
High-risk: ≥1 of del(17p), t(4;14) → OS ~3-4 yr w/o novel agents
Very-high: Complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) → historically OS <2 yr, improving w/ combos
48.5.3 Additional Risk Factors
Adverse: - High LDH, high β2-M - High PC labeling index - MRD+ after induction - Advanced age, poor PS
48.5.4 Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Critical prognostic marker: MRD-neg post-ASCT → improved OS
Methods: - Flow: ≥10^-4 sensitivity (practical) - NGS: ≥10^-6 sensitivity (VDJ clonotype)
Timing: Post-induction, post-ASCT, at relapse
48.6 Treatment: Initial (Eligible for ASCT)
Pathway: Induction × 4-6 cycles → ASCT → Maintenance
48.6.1 Induction Regimens (Triplets)
VRd (preferred): - Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV d 1, 4, 8, 11 - Lenalidomide 25 mg d 1-14 - Dex 40 mg weekly × 4 cycles - ≥VGPR ~50%; median PFS ~30+ mo post-ASCT
VTD: - Bortezomib, thalidomide 100 mg qd, dex - CR ~45%, ≥VGPR ~70%; median OS >10 yr - PN risk 20% grade ≥2
Daratumumab combos: - DVD (daratumumab-bortezomib-dex) - ↑ ≥VGPR, faster kinetics
48.6.2 ASCT
- Indications: Age <65-70, good PS, adequate organ fn
- Preparatory: High-dose melphalan 200 mg/m²
- Target: ≥2 × 10^6 CD34+/kg
- Outcomes: TRM ~2-3%, ≥VGPR ~80-90%
48.6.3 Maintenance (Post-ASCT)
Lenalidomide (standard): - 10-15 mg daily indefinite - PFS +7 mo, improves OS - Manageable toxicity
Bortezomib: - 1.3 mg/m² SC q 3 weeks - Median PFS 36 mo
Response (IMWG):
| Response | Criteria |
|---|---|
| CR | No M-protein (IF), <5% BM PC, normal FLC |
| ≥VGPR | M-protein by IF only or <5% BM PC |
| PR | ≥50% ↓ M-protein, ≥90% ↓ urine |
| sCR | CR + normal FLC, no BM PC |
| MRD- | No clonal PC (NGS/flow ≥10^-5) |
| PD | ≥25% ↑ M-protein or ≥200 mg/24h urine |
48.7 Treatment: Initial (Ineligible for ASCT)
48.7.1 Lenalidomide & Dex (Rd)
- Lenalidomide 25 mg d 1-21, dex 40 mg weekly
- ≥VGPR ~55%, median PFS 22 mo
- VTE risk 10-15% → aspirin prophylaxis
- Continue indefinite or to progression
48.7.2 Bortezomib-based (VD, VRd)
- Vd (bortezomib-dex): ≥VGPR ~50%, OS ~4.8 yr (elderly)
- Preferred if renal impairment
- PN risk, infusion requirement
48.7.3 Daratumumab Combos
- DVD (daratumumab-bortezomib-dex)
- ALCYONE (dara-VMP): PFS 24 mo vs. 19 mo (VMP alone)
- Improved efficacy, consider cost/infusion burden
48.8 Treatment: Relapsed/Refractory MM
48.8.1 Risk Assessment @ Relapse
- TTP <6 mo = early relapse (poor prognosis)
- TTP >1 yr = late relapse (rechallengeprior agents)
- Prior therapy resistance, del(17p), TP53 mutations = very poor
- MRD status at relapse prognostic
48.8.2 Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies
Daratumumab: - Monotherapy: ~35% response (early relapse) - w/ Len/Dex: ~80% ≥PR
Isatuximab: - Similar mechanism, outcomes to daratumumab
Elotuzumab (anti-SLAMF7): - w/ Len/Dex: ↑ PFS vs. Len/Dex alone
48.8.3 Proteasome Inhibitors
Carfilzomib (next-gen): - 27 mg/m² IV d 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 - ~55-65% response (PI-naive) - Lower PN risk than bortezomib - Monitor cardiac toxicity
Ixazomib (oral): - 4 mg weekly w/ Len/Dex - ~68-72% ≥PR (relapsed) - Lower PN risk
Bortezomib re-challenge: - If >1 yr from last exposure
48.8.4 IMiDs
Pomalidomide: - 4 mg d 1-21 w/ dex or bortezomib - ~45-50% response (len-refractory)
Lenalidomide: - 10-15 mg qd indefinite - PFS ~12-18 mo w/ combos - VTE prophylaxis: aspirin
48.8.5 High-Risk Approach
Quad induction (triplet + daratumumab or PI): - Goal: MRD-neg, low residual burden - Consider early 2nd ASCT if eligible
MRD-driven: - MRD-neg: Lenalidomide monotherapy - MRD+: Intensified duplet/triplet
48.9 Supportive Care
48.9.1 Bone Disease
Bisphosphonates: - Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV monthly × 12 mo (hold if eGFR <30) - Pamidronate 90 mg IV monthly - Effect: ↓ bone resorption, prevents SRE - ONJ risk 1-5%; monitor w/ prolonged use
Denosumab (RANKL inhibitor): - SC monthly; no renal adjustment - ↓ SRE vs. zoledronic acid - Preferred in renal impairment
Supportive: Ca & Vit D, weight-bearing exercise, avoid NSAIDs, PPI if high-dose dex, radiation for focal pain
48.9.2 Anemia
- ESA if Hb <10; target 10-12 g/dL
- Iron if deficient
- Transfusion for symptomatic (target Hb >7)
- G-CSF for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
48.9.3 Renal Dysfunction
Prevention: - Adequate hydration - Avoid NSAIDs, nephrotoxins - Alkalize urine (sodium bicarbonate)
Management: - Bortezomib preferred (not renally excreted) - Adjust lenalidomide/pomalidomide for eGFR - Dialysis for ESRD; may recover renal fn
48.9.4 Infections
Prophylaxis: - IVIG 0.4 g/kg monthly (hypogammaglobulinemia + recurrent infections) - Prophylactic antibiotics (levofloxacin) for high-risk neutropenia - Vaccines: PCV13, PPSV23, influenza, COVID-19
Management: Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics for fever
48.9.5 Peripheral Neuropathy
Agents: Bortezomib (dose-dependent), lenalidomide, thalidomide, ixazomib
Prevention: Minimize cumulative bortezomib
Grading: NCI-CTCAEv5
Management: Dose reduction if grade 2-3; gabapentin/pregabalin; substitute if grade ≥3
48.9.6 Other Complications
Hyperviscosity (1-2%): - Plasmapheresis for acute relief - Chemotherapy for underlying disease
Cord compression (~10%): - MRI spine (dx) - High-dose dex 10-16 mg IV qd × 3-5 d - Radiation, surgery if unstable
Hypercalcemia (10-20%): - IV hydration, loop diuretics - Bisphosphonates, dex 40 mg/d × 4 d - Calcitonin for immediate effect (onset <4 h)
AL amyloidosis (~5%): - Light chain deposition; biopsy confirmation - Consider if neuropathy, proteinuria, cardiomyopathy
48.10 Other Plasma Cell Disorders
48.10.1 Solitary Plasmacytoma of Bone
- Single clonal PC focus, no MM; 10% progress
- Dx: Biopsy, imaging to exclude lesions
- Tx: Radiation 40-50 Gy → CR >75%
- F/u: Monitor for MM progression
48.10.2 Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma
- Rare: PC tumor outside BM (ENT, sinuses, orbit, lung, GI, skin)
- >50% develop MM
- Tx: Radiation ± chemotherapy if disseminated
- Prognosis: Median OS 5-10 yr
48.10.3 Nonsecretory MM (3-5%)
- Clonal BM PC ≥10% w/o M-protein
- Challenge: No M-protein for monitoring
- Dx: PC morphology, immunophenotyping, FISH
- Monitor: FLC ratio, imaging (MRI, PET-CT)
48.10.4 Plasma Cell Leukemia
- Circulating PC ≥2,000/μL (>5% WBC)
- Aggressive: Median age 55 yr, median OS 7-12 mo
- Risk factors: TP53 mutations, hepatomegaly, ↑ LDH
- Tx: Intensive induction (quad combos), ASCT if eligible
- Consider: Clinical trial enrollment
48.11 Key Clinical Pearls
- MRD-neg = strongest prognostic marker; assess post-induction & post-ASCT (flow ≥10^-4 or NGS ≥10^-6)
- High-risk cytogenetics (del(17p), t(4;14), del(1p)) → intensive induction & early ASCT
- Maintenance post-ASCT prolongs PFS (+7 mo) & OS; lenalidomide standard; intensify if MRD+ or high-risk
48.12 Bibliography
Blade J, Lopez-Guillermo A, et al. Myeloma in patients with renal failure: presentation, prognosis, and relevance of r-ISS. Haematologica. 2017;102(2):214-221.
Chim CS, Kumar S, Tan D, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement and guidelines for the management of smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017;31(3):573-586.
Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Rosinol L, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22(8):1485-1493.
Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV. Role of novel agents in treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(4):563-580.
Fonseca R, Abramson J, Rajkumar SV, et al. Multiple myeloma: review on how to manage newly diagnosed patients. Am J Hematol. 2011;86(12):964-976.
Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412-3420.
Kumar SK, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, et al. Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory myeloma, and second-line disease outcomes from the PANORAMA1 and IFM2005-01 trials. Blood. 2017;130(21):2260-2266.
Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, et al. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):621-631.
Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(7):719-734.
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-e548.
Richardson PG, Lonial S, Jakubowiak AJ, et al. Ixazomib-based regimens for newly diagnosed patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1619-1629.
San Miguel JS, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906-917.
Terpos E, Kleber M, Engelhardt M, et al. European Myeloma Network guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma-related complications. Haematologica. 2015;100(10):1254-1266.